The global logistics world, which for decades ran on handshakes and phone calls, has been completely upended by digital marketing. You can see this change in action with Maersk’s early 2025 digital campaign, a targeted push to grow its cold chain solutions in some very specific North American markets. This Maersk update is a solid case study for how strategic digital work in logistics can produce real numbers, but what was the actual impact on the bottom line?
Key Takeaways
- Maersk’s “Cold Chain Connect” campaign ran from January 15 to April 15, 2025, with an $850,000 budget aimed squarely at food and pharma companies in the US Midwest and Northeast.
- They nailed a Cost Per Lead (CPL) of $125, which blew past their internal goal of $175 for landing these kinds of enterprise logistics deals.
- A Return On Ad Spend (ROAS) of 3.8:1 was tracked, meaning that for every dollar they put in, they got $3.80 in attributable revenue back within just six months.
- The best-performing channels were LinkedIn Sponsored Content and targeted display ads on trade websites, which pulled in Click-Through Rates (CTR) of 1.8% and 0.9%, respectively.
- Conversion rates on the campaign’s main landing pages hit an average of 4.5%, which works out to a cost per conversion of $2,778 for each qualified sales opportunity.
“Digital marketing teams that integrate AEO into their existing measurement and editorial processes now will have both the operational infrastructure and the attribution story when AI-assisted discovery becomes a primary channel for their buyers.”
Campaign Strategy: “Cold Chain Connect”
In January 2025, Maersk kicked off its “Cold Chain Connect” campaign. The whole point was to break into the crowded North American market for temperature-controlled shipping. The strategy was built around solving the real-world headaches that food and pharma companies deal with daily: keeping products from spoiling, staying on the right side of regulators, and making their supply chains more efficient. We used a bunch of different tactics, all guided by data to pick the right messaging and channels.
The main goal was simple: get leads for Maersk’s integrated cold chain services. Beyond that, we also wanted to solidify their brand as a leader in this niche and teach potential customers about the details of cold chain management. We got really specific with geography, targeting the farming belt of the US Midwest (think Illinois, Iowa, Nebraska) and the big pharma hubs in the Northeast (like New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts). This tight focus meant we could tailor the creative and media buys for each region.
The whole thing ran on a budget of $850,000 over three months, from January 15 to April 15, 2025. That money had to cover all the ad spend, making the creative, optimizing landing pages, and paying for analytics tools. About 60% of it was earmarked for paid media right from the start, with the rest going to content development and other operational costs.
Creative Approach: Precision and Problem-Solving
Our creative angle was to show Maersk as a full-on partner for keeping the cold chain intact. We made a bunch of short-form video ads (15-30 seconds), animated infographics, and e-books filled with case studies. A recurring visual we used showed the complex journey of a temperature-sensitive product from start to finish, with a big emphasis on control and transparency. For example, one ad used a time-lapse to show a pharma shipment holding its exact temperature across the entire trip, a visual that instantly communicates reliability.
The messaging was all about tangible benefits like “99.9% Temperature Adherence,” “Real-time Visibility,” and “Compliance-Ready Solutions.” We skipped the vague corporate-speak and stuck to claims we could prove. The call-to-action (CTA) was always one of two things: “Download Our Cold Chain Playbook” or “Request a Specialized Consultation,” sending people to purpose-built landing pages.
We ran A/B tests on headlines and found that direct, benefit-focused ones like “Protect Your Pharma Supply Chain” worked way better than ones that talked about features like “Advanced Reefer Technology.” For the visuals, we learned that pictures of clean, temperature-controlled warehouses with data overlays resonated a lot more with our audience than abstract pictures of container ships on the ocean.
Targeting and Channel Mix
We built our targeting using a mix of demographic, firmographic, and behavioral data. The focus was on decision-makers in supply chain, procurement, and operations roles at companies with over 250 employees and more than $50 million in annual revenue. The industries were mostly pharmaceuticals, biotech, specialty foods, and fresh produce distributors.
The campaign used a few key channels where we knew our audience was active:
- LinkedIn Sponsored Content and InMail: This was our bread and butter for getting in front of B2B decision-makers. We used LinkedIn’s targeting to zero in on job titles, industries, company sizes, and even specific skills people listed on their profiles (like “supply chain optimization” or “cold storage”).
- Programmatic Display Advertising: We ran display ads on a network of trade websites and online publications, including places like Supply Chain Dive and Pharmaceutical Technology. Geotargeting made sure we were only showing these ads to people in our target regions in North America.
- Google Search Ads (Paid Search): Here, we went after long-tail, high-intent keywords like “pharmaceutical cold chain logistics provider,” “temperature controlled shipping food,” and “regulated reefer transport.” We also did some strategic bidding on competitor keywords when it made sense.
- Industry Webinar Series: We co-hosted three live webinars with a respected industry analyst firm, which gave us a great educational angle. We promoted these through email to a hand-picked list and with paid social ads.
A key to making this work was adjusting the ad spend every week based on what the performance data was telling us. We started with 40% of the budget on LinkedIn, 30% on programmatic, and 20% on Google Search, with the last 10% for webinar promotion. That mix definitely changed as the campaign went on.
Performance Metrics and Analysis
The numbers from “Cold Chain Connect” really show what a focused digital plan can do in a tough B2B market. Here’s how it all shook out:
Campaign Performance Overview
| Metric | Result | Target | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Impressions | 18,500,000 | 15,000,000 | +23.3% |
| Total Clicks | 135,000 | 100,000 | +35.0% |
| Overall CTR | 0.73% | 0.65% | +12.3% |
| Total Leads Generated | 6,800 | 4,850 | +40.2% |
| Qualified Sales Opportunities | 306 | 270 | +13.3% |
| Cost Per Lead (CPL) | $125 | $175 | -28.6% |
| Cost Per Qualified Opportunity | $2,778 | $3,150 | -11.8% |
| Return On Ad Spend (ROAS) | 3.8:1 | 3.0:1 | +26.7% |
The campaign crushed its lead gen and ROAS goals. That CPL of $125 was especially good for a high-ticket enterprise service, showing our ad spend was efficient and the targeting was on point. To put that in perspective, a 2024 Statista report shows that B2B logistics CPLs can easily hit $200-$500, so we were well ahead of the curve.
Channel-Specific Performance
| Channel | Impressions | Clicks | CTR | Leads | CPL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LinkedIn Sponsored Content | 7,200,000 | 129,600 | 1.80% | 4,100 | $110 |
| Programmatic Display | 9,300,000 | 83,700 | 0.90% | 2,150 | $145 |
| Google Search Ads | 2,000,000 | 10,000 | 0.50% | 550 | $160 |
| Webinar Promotions (Email/Paid Social) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2,000 (registrants) | $85 (per registrant) |
LinkedIn Sponsored Content was the clear winner here, bringing in the best CTR and the cheapest CPL for direct leads. Its ability to get so specific with professional roles and company details was a huge advantage. The webinars also did great, generating a ton of engaged prospects for a very low cost per registrant, and we were able to nurture a lot of them into solid leads afterward.
What Worked and What Didn’t
What Worked:
- Hyper-Targeted LinkedIn Campaigns: The ability to target specific job titles on LinkedIn was everything. Making different content for a supply chain manager versus a pharma R&D director made a huge difference in engagement.
- Problem/Solution Creative: Ads that got straight to the point (e.g., “Are your biologics at risk during transit?”) and then offered Maersk’s fix performed the best. The “Cold Chain Playbook” was a great lead magnet because it provided real, actionable advice.
- Dedicated Landing Pages: We didn’t just dump everyone on the homepage. Each ad group had its own landing page with a message that matched the ad they just clicked, which helped keep bounce rates low and pushed our conversion rates up to an average of 4.5%.
- Real-time Optimization: The team was in the accounts daily, tweaking bids and swapping out creative. For example, we saw that ads with direct quotes from existing clients had a 15% better conversion rate than our more general brand ads, so we immediately put more money behind them.
What Didn’t Work as Expected:
- Broad Keyword Bidding on Google Search: Our initial attempts to bid on big, general terms like “logistics solutions” were a money pit, bringing in expensive and low-quality leads. We had to pivot fast to super-specific long-tail keywords which fixed the CPL but also meant fewer impressions. It was the right trade-off.
- Generic Stock Photography: We tried some stock photos in early tests, and they bombed. Anything that looked fake or wasn’t directly related to the logistics process had terrible performance. We switched to custom photos and graphics that showed Maersk’s actual equipment and tech.
- Early-Stage Retargeting: Retargeting people who only spent a few seconds on a landing page was a waste of money with almost no conversions. This is a common mistake. Not every site visitor is worth chasing. We had to tighten our retargeting lists to focus only on people who showed real engagement, like viewing multiple pages or downloading content.
Optimization Steps Taken
After the first few weeks, we looked at the data and made some big changes on the fly:
- Budget Reallocation: We took 15% of the budget we’d initially planned for Google Search Ads (where the CPL on broad terms was too high) and moved it over to LinkedIn and webinar promotions, which were giving us better leads for less money.
- Creative Refresh: To keep things from getting stale, we rolled out new ad creative every two weeks, especially on LinkedIn and the display network. This constant testing let us try new angles. A new set of ads we made about Maersk’s IoT tracking tech, for instance, gave us a 0.2% bump in CTR on LinkedIn.
- Landing Page Enhancements: We were constantly A/B testing our landing pages. Simple things made a difference. We found that shortening the lead form from 8 fields down to 5 fields gave us a 0.8 percentage point lift in conversion rates.
- Audience Segmentation Refinement: On the programmatic display side, we got smarter about our audience segments. We started excluding industries that were less likely to need our services, like small local retailers, and focused more on national and international distributors. This cut our wasted impressions by 10%.
- Sales Team Feedback Loop: We had regular meetings with the Maersk sales team to hear what they thought of the leads we were sending them. This feedback was gold. It helped us tweak our targeting and messaging to make sure we were delivering leads the sales team was actually excited about. For example, they told us leads from companies with fewer than 100 employees almost never closed, so we adjusted our filters on LinkedIn.
This campaign’s success wasn’t an accident. It happened because of constant monitoring, making decisions based on data, and being willing to change course quickly. Maersk’s willingness to really dig in and understand its digital audience paid off, and it set them up for future wins.
The “Cold Chain Connect” campaign proved that a focused, data-heavy digital marketing strategy can deliver a serious return in the complex world of B2B logistics. If you’re willing to be obsessive about precise targeting, create content that solves real problems, and constantly optimize, you can drive down your cost per lead and get a great return on ad spend. The whole game is about relentless analysis and being agile enough to act on what you find.
What was the main goal of Maersk’s “Cold Chain Connect” campaign?
The number one goal was to get qualified leads for their integrated cold chain services, specifically by targeting food and pharmaceutical companies in North America.
Which marketing channels worked best for the Maersk campaign?
LinkedIn Sponsored Content was the top performer, along with targeted programmatic display ads on niche industry websites. These channels brought in the best click-through rates and the most efficient cost per lead.
What was the final Return On Ad Spend (ROAS) for this campaign?
The campaign hit a 3.8:1 ROAS. This means for every dollar they spent on ads, they generated $3.80 in attributable revenue within a six-month window.
How did they optimize their landing pages?
They used continuous A/B testing on things like the length of their forms and the color of the CTA buttons. One specific win was shortening a lead form from 8 fields to 5, which by itself increased the conversion rate by 0.8 percentage points.
What was the big lesson they learned about using Google Search Ads?
The key lesson was that bidding on broad, generic keywords on Google was a waste of money that produced low-quality leads. They had to switch their strategy to focus on very specific, long-tail keywords to get the efficiency and lead quality they needed.